September 19, 2021 Comment off
Do you think Cassandra will ever be less troubled by the events described in this case?
Before Cassandra could have her first round of chemotherapy to treat Hodgkin lymphoma, she had to have a port placed in her body to deliver the cancer-fighting drugs. During this surgical procedure, she had to be strapped to the bed against her wishes, for she was adamantly against receiving chemotherapya treatment she deemed poisonous to her body, despite knowing that without it she would almost certainly die. Had Cassandra been at least 18 years old, she would have had the legal right to refuse the cancer treatment. From a legal and moral standpoint, the doctrine of informed consent and informed refusal protects the liberty of competent adults to make autonomous medical decisions. However, being only 17, Cassandras wishes were dismissed by the Connecticut Supreme Court. The judges unanimously ruled that Cassandra could be forced by the state to receive chemotherapy, because she lacked the necessary maturity to make her own medical decisions. After receiving her diagnosis, Cassandra and her mother, Jackie Fortin, began to miss medical appointments, in order to avoid the prescribed chemotherapy. According to Cassandra, her mother urged her to reconsider her staunch position against chemotherapy. Unable to change her daughters mind, Fortin ultimately decided to respect the girls decision. Given that Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly treatable form of cancer, but fatal without treatment, Cassandras doctors reported Fortin for neglect to the Department of Children and Families (DCF). Shortly thereafter, Cassandra was removed from her home and placed under the custody of the state. As Kristina Stevens, a DCF representative, declared, if the system . . . [didnt] react and respond, this child . . . [would] die. While young children clearly lack the capacity to make autonomous medical decisions, adolescents, especially older ones, pose a challenge to the doctrine of the presumed incompetence (i.e., lack of legal ability) of minors. Adolescents find themselves at a transitional stage between the incompetence of childhood and the competence and autonomy of adulthood. Thus, as Dr. Saskia Nagel, a neuroscientist and philosopher, has argued, [a]utonomy should not be viewed as an all-or-none phenomenon. One does not have it fully or not at all. Instead, she proposes that autonomy should be considered a gradual phenomenon that develops over time. This idea was echoed by Joshua Michtom, Cassandras public defender, when he said that teenagers can get contraception. They can get addiction treatment. They can donate blood. They can be tried as adults for certain crimes. So theres recognition overall that maturity doesnt happen overnight. You dont go to sleep a 17-year-old knucklehead and wake up an 18-year-old sage. Thus, some states have adopted the mature minor doctrine, which grants individuals under 18 with a sufficient level of maturity the right to refuse medical treatment. However, the courts have recognized that this right is not absolute . . . [and] could be limited by the state interest to preserve life. Cassandra was in remission for several months. She returned to her home and resumed her normal life, she is still troubled by what happened to her: I will never be okay with how this all happened being taken away from home, hospitalized and especially being strapped to the bed . . . I still wish I was given the right to explore and go with alternatives . . . Anybody should have that right. Minor or not. Sadly, shortly after her eighteenth birthday, a malignancy was found in her lung. Cassandra, since she was now of legal age, refused medical treatment and tried several different homeopathic treatments for cancer. The cancer has spread to several other organs, and Cassandra has returned to the hospital and is undergoing chemotherapy. Her prognosis is not good at this point. What information from the textbook might be relevant to this situation? Which principles of cognitive psychology can be used to explain Cassandras choices and the doctors’ choices? Which principles of social psychology are relevant to this case? Which principles from community psychology and group psychology are relevant? Do you think Cassandra will ever be less troubled by the events described in this case? Why or why not? Would your conclusions and opinions differ had Cassandra not survived? Why or why not? What about if Cassandra had been elderly, and suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease? Support your answers with at least two recent (within the past 10 years) peer-reviewed references (no e-books!). Each student must identify and use different sources from other students no double- dipping! (This means first-come, first-served. Post early to ensure your reference sources are available.) Provide appropriate citations and references. Make a substantive response to at least two of your fellow students’ postings. Go beyond I agree or That’s a good point kinds of comments. Critique what others are saying, suggest additional references or thoughts, or contribute to the conversation in another meaningful way.